[CSPS] running for education
Jonathan Coopersmith
j-coopersmith at tamu.edu
Mon Oct 24 13:16:56 CDT 2005
FYI,
Jonathan
Fed up, pro-education candidates step up
Believing lawmakers won't give schools a fair shake, some educators will
try to take their jobs instead.
by
<http://www.statesman.com/metrostate/content/metro/stories/10/mailto:jembry@statesman.com>Jason
Embry,
<http://www.statesman.com/metrostate/content/metro/stories/10/mailto:relder@statesman.com>Robert
Elder
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Sunday, October 23, 2005
WAXAHACHIE At a recent Rotary Club meeting in nearby Midlothian, Q.D.
"Duke" Burge had planned to deliver an energetic speech for his campaign
for the Texas House. The day before, he was told that the club doesn't
allow political speeches. Undeterred, Burge sat down at the club's piano
and knocked out a five-song set that featured indirect jabs at the Legislature.
"Whatever it takes," Burge said over lunch at the Applebee's near his
computer services business.
Burge is in his sixth year on the Midlothian school board, so he's no
political novice. But he's punching in a new weight class, challenging
13-year incumbent Jim Pitts, the well-funded chairman of the House
Appropriations Committee, in the Republican primary in March.
An impossible dream? In most years, yes, and probably in 2006 as well.
But Burge hopes to tap a well of frustration over lawmakers' repeated
failure to improve public schools while also lowering property taxes.
Burge, in fact, is just one of about 15 candidates with education ties,
either as school board members, administrators or teachers, who are
planning to run for House seats next year. That's an unusually high number,
and more candidates are likely to emerge in the next couple of months. Many
are counting on unprecedented turnout and financial support from
education-minded voters.
Beyond the Legislature's lack of policy solutions, some educators are
infuriated by what they see as lawmakers' disregard for their opinions and
contempt for how they do their jobs. In August, for instance, House Speaker
Tom Craddick characterized the school system as a "bottomless pit" in need
of reform as much as new funds.
"The difficult thing for all of us is not to take this personally," says
Mary Ann Whiteker, superintendent of the Hudson Independent School District
and president of the Texas Association of Mid-Size Schools. "You just walk
through the Capitol thinking, 'Why do they hate me so much?' "
"Of course," she adds, "I think there were times where legislators thought
we hated them."
All this is more than name-calling. Control of the education agenda in the
Legislature affects how much money schools have and who is going to pay
more taxes as a result. The state ranks near the bottom nationally in
high-school graduation rates and Scholastic Assessment Test scores, and
it's in the bottom 50 percent in teacher pay and per-student spending.
School districts are plagued by reports of cheating on standardized tests
and concealing dropout rates, among other governance issues.
Long term, the health of the state economy rides on the quality of public
education. The friction between legislators and educators raises questions
about the chances for reaching consensus on the way forward.
School lobbying groups of every stripe prided themselves on maintaining a
solid front this year at the Capitol. They fought off proposals for private
tuition vouchers, a plan to let voters veto tax increases by school
districts and a funding proposal they deemed inadequate.
But a political campaign is a more individual pursuit, and the emergence of
the new House candidates has been far less organized. Education groups seem
unlikely to unify behind them, considering that these candidates stress
varying issues to the extent they've laid out agendas at all.
View from the top
State District Judge John Dietz last year declared the Texas system of
paying for schools unconstitutional. His ruling that schools do not have
the money to meet state and federal mandates emboldened school leaders, who
have borne the weight of legislative funding cuts and tougher state tests.
Legislative leaders entered 2005 trying to comply with the part of Dietz's
ruling that told the school finance system to rely less on property taxes.
But they largely ignored his calls for huge increases in state funding,
instead offering a smaller funding boost the House wanted $3 billion more
over two years, about a 4.5 percent increase in total funding paired with
education reforms that made school leaders nervous, such as incentive pay
for teachers and requiring school districts to hold elections in November
instead of May. School officials regularly lined up at meetings of the
House and Senate education committees to assail the school finance plans,
pleading for more money with fewer strings attached.
Rep. Bill Keffer, a Dallas Republican on the House committee, says he tuned
out education lobbyists who said they would rather have no funding increase
than what the House was offering. "After I heard about the 10th person say
that, it almost became pointless for those folks to come testify before the
committee, as far as I was concerned personally, because I didn't feel like
they were participating in the process in good faith," he says. The Senate
fought off some of the most controversial elements of the House proposal,
such as moving school board elections to November and capping the amount of
money that districts with extremely high property values must share with
the rest of the state.
In part because of educators' objections, the two chambers didn't complete
a plan during their 140-day regular session or two 30-day special sessions.
That made a total of five fruitless sessions since 2003.
Keffer likens education groups to the Luddites, English workers who
destroyed manufacturing equipment to slow the Industrial Revolution.
"I imagine someone sitting around, hoisting a mug of ale after busting the
printing press thinking, 'Well, we took care of that, didn't we?' " he
says. "Well, that lasted for however long it lasted, but it didn't stop
progress."
House Public Education Committee Chairman Kent Grusendorf, R-Arlington,
says not all educators opposed the plan. House members behind the plan
included former teachers Dianne Delisi and Glenda Dawson, former principal
Martha Wong and Rob Eissler, a former school board member.
At least one of the educators now seeking a House seat says he, too, found
the leadership plan "acceptable."
Republican Kelly Hancock has been on the Birdville school board near Fort
Worth for 13 years; he also owns a chemical distribution company.
"I'm a businessman, strong conservative, that happened to be involved in
education for 13 years," says Hancock, who is running for a seat being
vacated by Bob Griggs, R-North Richland Hills.
The parent PAC
Carolyn Boyle is a former PTA president at Doss Elementary School in
Austin. For eight years she coordinated the Coalition for Public Schools, a
leading voice against vouchers, which would use public money to send
students to private schools.
Vouchers failed again this year. Even with that victory, Boyle says she
became fed up with what she saw as a Legislature that did not listen to
educators or parents. She and a handful of like-minded parents formed the
Texas Parent Political Action Committee to dole out campaign contributions
to candidates whom they consider pro-education.
The PAC has received donations from 150 people. Boyle declines to give a
total raised so far but has set a goal of $125,000 for the March primaries.
"Our hope is that a typical contribution will be $5,000 to $10,000 per
candidate, plus a group of parent volunteers recruited by Texas Parent
PAC," she says. Though Boyle's anti-voucher work had made her a thorn in
the side of many Republicans, she expects GOP candidates to receive much of
that support. That's different from the approach taken for the 2004
primaries by the state's four major teacher groups, whose political
committees stuck to incumbents or gave most of their money to Democrats.
In heavily Republican districts, though, the GOP primary is the only race
that matters.
The groups that focused their money on Democrats say that could change if
they find the right candidates. "As Republican party politics mature, we
probably will become increasingly involved in Republican primary races,"
says Richard Kouri, public affairs director for the Texas State Teachers
Association. The other group is the Texas Federation of Teachers.
"Let's just come up with some new talent," Boyle says. "Clearly, the talent
that's there couldn't get the job done."
Grass roots
If Boyle is a familiar insider at the Capitol, Frank "Bo" Camp is a field
soldier. On a Tuesday night early this month, Camp, clad in sweat pants and
a T-shirt, perspires mightily as he sets up tables and chairs inside the
sweltering Former Students' Association Building in the small East Texas
town of Gladewater. Camp's wife, Carmen Camp, is a special education
teacher in the nearby Longview Independent School District.
Both are also brand-new political activists. They are two of the founders
of a group called No Texas Teacher Left Behind, which is holding the fifth
in a series of rally-the-troops meetings, mostly in East Texas.
Sitting on a folding chair, Bo Camp thumbs through thousands of pages of
e-mails the group has received since June through its Web site. "We can't
even answer them all," he says.
"We're degraded; we're laughed at by legislators," says Bo Camp, a former
trustee of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. "It just blows my mind
that those people feel the way they do about public education."
Two middle-school teachers in Gladewater, Jan Doerr and Martha Wright,
established the group as the regular legislative session endedin the spring.
"We're full-time educators who decided that just whining is not our style,"
Wright tells the group of about 70 people.
No Texas Teacher's agenda calls for a $4,000 teacher pay raise, a
cost-of-living raise for retirees, who haven't had one since 2001, and more
state money for the underfunded Teacher Retirement System.
Showing a PowerPoint slide on the generous pensions for veteran lawmakers
a lawmaker with just 12 years of service can draw a $34,000 annual pension
Wright peers over her glasses and says, "Let's help these legislators
reach their retirement goals" by throwing them out of office.
The group is trying to marshal the votes and financial strength of the
state's 1.1 million active and retired educators roughly one of every 20
Texans.
Mesquite Fire Department Lt. Chuck Tull is there with his wife, Susan, a
fourth-grade teacher. He is challenging two-term House member Dan Flynn of
Van in the GOP primary.
Voters know "we've not really accomplished anything" on education at the
Capitol, Tull says as his wife grades papers nearby. "I think we're going
to have a few fresh faces" in the next Legislature.
Fighting history
In 2004, all 12 Republican House members who had primary challengers
walloped them, each getting more than 60 percent of the vote.
Republican political consultant Craig Murphy predicts that no GOP candidate
would win in 2006 running against the party's education position. "I don't
know what the major issue is going to be in March, but it's not going to
necessarily be the same one that was a major issue in July," Murphy says.
Retired Lewisville school Superintendent Clayton Downing ran for the House
in 2002, saying he would use his experience to improve the school finance
system. Incumbent Mary Denny beat him by 19 points in the Republican primary.
Downing figured he had a strong support base because the suburban Dallas
district included part of the school district where he was superintendent
for 18 years. He said longtime friends who were active in GOP politics told
him they had to publicly support Denny because she had the support of the
party establishment.
"I worked my tail off and could not get people to vote," said Downing, who
today heads the Texas School Coalition, a group of districts with high
property values. "It was just really hard to focus in and get people to
really give it the attention that I thought it deserved."
Downing said a challenger running in the primary "doesn't have a prayer"
without unifying all of the education groups, such as those representing
teachers, parents and administrators, in their districts.
But pulling all of those forces together for a House campaign is unheard
of, he said. "I think it could happen, but I sure haven't seen it happen,"
he said.
Groups that present a united front to all of the legislators in the Capitol
see their influence diluted when it is spread among 254 counties and 150
House districts, and the burden falls to local officials and teachers who
often do not have an interest in politics, he said.
Challengers are bound to be underfunded, as well. If the Texas Parent PAC,
for example, were to contribute $10,000 to Burge, that would be small beer
compared to Pitts' fundraising muscle. In 2004, against a 21-year-old
Democratic opponent, Pitts raised about $300,000 and won 72 percent of the
vote.
But former Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Ratliff said the school community could
be a force.
"That is the great unanswered question, whether this sleeping giant of
PTAs, school boards and teachers will ever organize enough to make their
presence known" at the polls, says Ratliff, who advises the Texas
Association of School Boards. "I do think it's a sleeping giant, though."
What the Legislature liked, educators didn't
Proposals that leading lawmakers supported, and many educators opposed,
during this year's legislative sessions. Included in broader school finance
legislation, they ultimately died when the Legislature failed to reach a
consensus on the finance issue.
Voter-approved tax increases
Legislature: Wanted school boards to seek voter approval before boosting
tax rates beyond the state cap, arguing that it would give taxpayers more
control.
Educators: Said the elections would hurt children in areas that regularly
defeat tax increases; said other political bodies, such as the Legislature,
do not need voter approval to increase taxes.
Incentive pay for teachers
Legislature: Said principals should be able to reward teachers with higher
salaries if they take challenging assignments or if their students show
marked improvement.
Educators: Teacher groups say incentive-pay programs concentrate raises in
the hands of a few teachers.
November school board elections
Legislature: House leaders said November elections would produce higher
turnout in school board elections, giving more taxpayers a say in choosing
their boards. Turnout is always higher in November, when there are more
high-profile races than in May. Senate leaders showed much less enthusiasm
than their House counterparts for November board elections.
Educators: Said school board candidates, now elected in May in most
districts, would be lost among the many partisan races held in November and
would be asked by voters' groups to answer questions on topics unrelated to
education, such as gun control and abortion.
Instructional spending
Legislature: Said schools should spend at least 65 percent of their
operating budgets on instruction, up from 63.8 percent.
Educators: Argued that the mandate, without a significant increase in
overall funding, would tie school boards' hands and trigger cuts in areas
such as counseling, transportation and food services.
(Note: After this failed to clear the Legislature, Gov. Rick Perry ordered
the Texas Education Agency to write and implement a 65 percent rule.)
New to the game
Groups formed in the past 13 months to promote education issues.
Texas Parent PAC
Headquarters: Austin
Mission: political action committee for "pro-public-education" candidates
Goal: Raise $125,000 for 2006 primaries
Leader: Carolyn Boyle, former lobbyist for Coalition for Public Schools
Size: 150 donors to date
----------
No Texas Teacher Left Behind
Headquarters: Gladewater
Mission: "Restore respect" from lawmakers and the governor for public educators
Goal: Generate widespread activism and voting among educators
Leaders: Martha Wright and Jan Doerr, middle-school teachers in Gladewater
Size: Undetermined; group is processing membership applications and sorting
through 4,000-plus e-mails
----------
Friends of Texas Public Schools
Headquarters: Rockwall
Mission: "Strengthen the public's faith in public schools"
Goal: Apolitical public relations campaign and polling to boost public
support for school system
Leader: Scott Milder, vice president of an architectural firm that designs
school facilities
Size: 500 individuals ($25 minimum contribution) and about 35 business
($500 minimum) have donated money
From schools to the campaign trail
Candidates with ties to education are emerging at a faster-than-usual pace
to run for the Texas House. Many are frustrated by the political stalemate
over school finance. But they're not a slate of candidates in the
traditional sense, and they hold varying views on education and tax issues.
Other candidates are likely to emerge before the end of the candidate
filing period in January.
District Name Party Education tie Incumbent
2 Graham Sweeney Democrat Boles superintendent Rep. Dan Flynn, R-Van
2 Chuck Tull Republican Edgewood school board Rep. Dan Flynn, R-Van
10 Duke Burge Republican Midlothian school board Rep. Jim Pitts, R-Waxahachie
48 Donna Howard Democrat Formerly on Eanes school board Rep. Todd Baxter,
R-Austin*
48 Kathy Rider Democrat Formerly on Austin school board Rep. Todd Baxter,
R-Austin*
52 Kelly Felthauser Democrat Substitute teacher Rep. Mike Krusee,
R-Williamson County
54 Jimmie Don Aycock Republican Formerly on Killeen school board Rep.
Suzanna Hupp, R-Lampasas*
63 Anne Lakusta Republican Formerly on Lewisville school board Rep. Mary
Denny, R-Aubrey
72 Drew Darby Republican school site management committee Rep. Scott
Campbell, R-San Angelo
72 Kevin Housley Republican Christoval school board Rep. Scott Campbell,
R-San Angelo
91 Kelly Hancock Republican Birdville school board Rep. Bob Griggs, R-North
Richland Hills*
98 Bill Skinner Republican Retired teacher, administrator Rep. Vicki
Truitt, R-Keller
129 Sherrie Matula Democrat Teacher Rep. John Davis, R-Houston
133 Barbara Larson Republican Formerly Spring Branch school board Rep. Joe
Nixon, R-Houston*
* Incumbent is not seeking re-election
[]
Find this article at:
http://www.statesman.com/metrostate/content/metro/stories/10/23statelocal.html
Jonathan Coopersmith
Associate Professor
Dept. of History
MS 4236
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas 77843
979.845.8584
979.862.4314 fax
Secretary
History & Philosophy of Science Section (L)
American Association for the Advancement of Science
aaas.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://philebus.tamu.edu/pipermail/csps/attachments/20051024/408b0e88/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: f62d5c.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 631 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://philebus.tamu.edu/pipermail/csps/attachments/20051024/408b0e88/f62d5c-0001.jpg
More information about the CSPS
mailing list