[SCL] naming ontologies

[pat hayes]

>Hi Pat...
>
>Gotta hit the road so this message will be quick.
>
>I agree that much of what Chris set out in his paper might end up as 
>overkill for these purposes.  At a first cut, I'd settle for some 
>syntactic notion of "document" (set of sentences) and "inclusion" of 
>a document "in" another document - yielding a document - and of 
>course attaching the semantic notions you do to those hooks.  That's 
>probably good enough.

Yep, thats what Im going to do, pretty much. You gotta be able to 
attach a URI ref to an ontology and put it up on a website.

>My point was only that we should *finish* step 1 before step 2, but 
>thanks for showing us some of step 2.

Well, my point is that step 2 is right in there in the core syntax of 
step 1. If we leave it out, its got no place to go.  But s'OK, step 2 
is easy. The hard part is still what was always the hard part, how to 
be flexible about functions.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes at ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes