[SCL] Issues and proposals (details)

[John F. Sowa]

Jim,

I'm not sure who or what "them" refers to:

JH> Of course, if we are even remotely successful, they'll be a lot more
 > of them than us reading this stuff.

Agents?  RDF designers?  RDF (human) programmers?

In any case, it doesn't matter.  A good SCL design would supported
by the same XML parsers as the RDF design.  So those programs and
programmers could just as easily (or even more easily) take advantage
of a clean SCL syntax as a grungy RDF syntax.

In fact, if I were developing commercial software, I would be delighted
to have my competitors use RDF syntax while I took advantage of a
cleaner, more efficient syntax.

John