[SCL] The semantics of "semantics"

[John F. Sowa]

Jim,

I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I agree that point #4
is the key rather than any particular syntax.

For the record, here's another copy:

 > 4. Compatibility with the W3C conventions for naming and
 >    linking is a non-negotiable requirement for any and every
 >    concrete syntax used to express SCL.  That requirement can
 >    be most easily satisfied by providing support for the W3C
 >    conventions directly in the abstract sytnax of SCL.

John