[Scl] Re: Report on Common Logic

[Chris Menzel]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:06:36PM -0500, John Sowa wrote:
> In any case, we desperately need some material that is humnaly
> readable, unlike Chris's SCL report, which sounds as if it was
> written for the Journal of Symbolic Logic.  

I'd say it *looks* more like it than sounds like it.  Yes, of course you
are right, but as noted many times -- and which, in the spirit of
genuine collaboration,  you should emphasize -- that document was never
meant for public consumption, but was intended only to get the framework
right for guiding friendlier exposition.

Pat, Tanel, and I were all able to spend time together at ISWC 2003 in
Florida last week, and all seem able to commit some fairly serious time
to SCL over the next 4-6 weeks.  I'll be putting version 1.02 on the web
in the next couple of weeks that will clarify a few things in light of 
some comments from Ian Horrocks.  And we definitely need to get a
friendlier document or two online.

-chris