[SCL] XML syntax options

[Murray Altheim]

Pat Hayes wrote:
[...]
> So, any opinions? Should we conform to MathML, or go it alone? Or do 
> both, ie give an XML syntax but explicitly allow the use of MathML?

Pat,

Just to be clear about my earlier reply, I think we simply can't
use MathML unless the semantics are identical. Now... that doesn't
mean that an *approach* to syntax similar to MathML isn't possible,
i.e., using an element-heavy approach.

Murray

......................................................................
Murray Altheim                    http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/murray/
Knowledge Media Institute
The Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 6AA, UK               .

   Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us
   http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,12374,1153530,00.html