[SCL] XML syntax options

[John F. Sowa]

Pat,

I agree with your conclusion:

 > I guess my own feeling is that since MathML exists and is
 > an accepted standard, and since it provides for almost all
 > of SCL syntax, why not just use it? That is, I think we would
 > need a positive reason NOT to use it if we decide not to:
 > the onus is on any alternative proposal to explain what
 > significant advantages accrue from using it rather than
 > using an existing standard that seems adequate and has
 > almost exactly the same motivation as SCL has.

John